A
team at Harvard Medical School has come up with a way to understand the
aneuplodiy patterns in tumors and how to predict which genes affect chromosomes
that are most likely to be cancer suppressors or promoters. This study proposed
that aneuplodiy is a driver of cancer not a result of cancer.
Over
the years, cancer research has focused on mutations that change the DNA and
promotes cancer. The role of aneuplodiy has not been unstudied. This study
predicts that the aneuploidy has a significant role in cancer. This prediction
is because the missing or extra chromosomes likely affect genes that are
involved in tumor related process.
This
study was tested by a developed computer program called TUSON (Tumor Suppressor
and Oncogene). This program analyzes the genome sequence from more than 8,200
pairs of cancerous and normal tissue samples. This generates a list of
suspected oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes based on the mutation pattern.
These also created a list of many more potential cancer drivers. From these
lists, they discovered that the number of tumor suppressor genes or oncogenes
in a chromosome correlated with how often the whole chromosome or part of the
chromosome was deleted or duplicated in the cancer.
These
concluded that aneuplody is a driver of cancer not a consequence of cancer.
Since this has been discovered, studies can now be done to figure out how
mutations, rearrangements and changes in expression weigh into cancer. They
plan to gather experimental evidence to support this mathematical finding.
Should they continue and explore this conclusion? Would this help researchers
find a cure?
Here
is the article if you would like to read it:
I think they should continue the research. Understanding if something is a cause or an effect is just the first step. After finding the cause, you have to find a way to target it therapeutically. Maybe gene therapy is the answer. Although, gene therapy has its own issues that need to be resolved.
ReplyDeleteI think they should continue with this research. At this point, I think any research is better than no research when it comes to being closer to finding a cure.
ReplyDelete